Case Study: Closed Loop Sampling System Upgrade at a Sinopec Refinery

編輯標準: 本文經由擁有 20 多年石化設備製造經驗的 Wanan Technology 工程人員審閱。內容參照 API、ISO、ASME 及 ATEX 標準。. 關於我們的團隊.

Project Overview

As one of the largest integrated energy and chemical companies in the world, Sinopec operates dozens of refineries and petrochemical complexes across China. At a major refinery in eastern China, the facility management identified a systematic gap in their process sampling infrastructure: multiple distillation units and intermediate tank farms were still relying on traditional open-loop (grab) sampling methods that posed significant safety, environmental, and data-quality risks.

Wanan Technology was contracted to design, manufacture, and supply a comprehensive closed loop sampling system package covering 18 sampling points across three process units — crude distillation, catalytic cracking, and product finishing. The project scope included engineering design, material selection, fabrication, factory acceptance testing (FAT), and on-site commissioning support.

The Challenge: Aging Sampling Infrastructure

The refinery’s existing sampling setup consisted of simple needle valves and open bottles — a method that had been in use since the facility’s original construction. Over years of operation and multiple HSE audits, several critical issues had been documented:

  • Operator Exposure: Sampling personnel were routinely exposed to benzene-containing streams, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile hydrocarbon vapors. Despite PPE requirements, the risk of acute exposure during high-pressure sampling events remained a persistent concern for the HSE department.
  • Fugitive VOC Emissions: Each open-loop sampling event released an estimated 0.5 to 2 liters of hydrocarbon vapor into the atmosphere. With hundreds of sampling operations per week across the refinery, the cumulative emissions were flagged in the facility’s environmental compliance audit as a priority remediation item.
  • Sample Inaccuracy: Lab personnel reported inconsistent Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) results and variable distillation endpoints on identical feedstock samples. Root cause analysis traced the discrepancy to light-end losses during open-air sample transfer — particularly problematic for naphtha and gasoline blend stock analysis.
  • Regulatory Pressure: China’s evolving GB 31570-2015 standard for petroleum refining pollutant emission limits, combined with Sinopec’s internal corporate HSE upgrade program, created a firm deadline for sampling system modernization.

Solution Design & Engineering

Wanan’s engineering team conducted a site survey to map all 18 sampling points, documenting process conditions for each location:

Process UnitSampling PointsTypical FluidPressure RangeTemperature Range
Crude Distillation7 pointsCrude feed, naphtha, kerosene, diesel, atmospheric residue0.5 – 3.5 MPa40 – 350 C
Catalytic Cracking6 pointsLCO, gasoline, LPG, rich amine, sour water0.8 – 4.0 MPa40 – 200 C
Product Finishing5 pointsFinished gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, reformate0.3 – 2.0 MPa30 – 80 C

Based on this survey, three sampling panel configurations were designed:

1. Constant-Pressure Piston Cylinder Panels (8 points)

For volatile streams (naphtha, LPG, gasoline, reformate), constant-pressure sampling cylinders with spring-loaded pistons were specified. These maintain the sample at process pressure throughout extraction and transport, preventing light-end flash vaporization that would corrupt RVP and distillation analysis. The panels were equipped with dual-valve isolation, pressure gauges, and integrated purge loops.

2. Standard Cylinder Sampling Panels (7 points)

For stable liquid streams (diesel, kerosene, atmospheric residue, LCO), standard 316L stainless steel sampling cylinders with needle valves were selected. These panels included a process isolation valve, purge/vent valve, and cylinder connection with quick-connect fittings for efficient operator workflow.

3. Heated Sampling Panel (3 points)

For high-viscosity streams (atmospheric residue at 350 C), steam-traced heated panels with oversized bore tubing (3/8 inch minimum) were engineered to maintain fluidity during the sampling cycle. The panel design included a cooling section to bring the sample to a manageable temperature before entering the cylinder.

Equipment Supplied

ItemSpecificationQuantity認證
Constant-pressure sampling panels316L SS, rated 6.4 MPa, with piston cylinder (500 mL)8 setsASME U-Stamp, GB/T 150
Standard sampling panels316L SS, rated 4.0 MPa, with cylinder (1 L)7 setsASME U-Stamp, GB/T 150
Heated sampling panels316L SS, steam-traced, rated 4.0 MPa, with cylinder (1 L)3 setsASME U-Stamp, GB/T 150
Spare sampling cylinders316L SS, 500 mL & 1 L, with double-end valves40 setsEN 10204 3.1, GB 5099
Spare seal kits & gasketsPTFE/Graphite, full set for 2-year operation1 lotFactory tested

Implementation & Commissioning

The project was executed over a 14-week timeline:

  1. Weeks 1-3: Detailed engineering, P&ID review, and material take-off. Wanan engineers worked with the refinery’s process engineering department to confirm all tie-in points, isolation valve locations, and sample routing paths.
  2. Weeks 4-10: Manufacturing and fabrication at Wanan’s ASME U-stamp certified facility in Honghu, Hubei. All pressure-bearing components were hydrostatically tested at 1.5x design pressure. Material traceability per EN 10204 3.1 was maintained throughout.
  3. Weeks 8-9: Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) conducted at Wanan’s facility with Sinopec inspection engineers present. Testing included pressure hold tests, valve functional tests, cylinder leak tests (helium sniffer at 1×10-6 std cc/sec sensitivity), and dimensional verification.
  4. Weeks 11-13: Shipment, site installation, and mechanical completion. Wanan field service engineers supervised the installation of all 18 sampling panels, including process tie-ins, tubing runs, and structural supports.
  5. Week 14: Commissioning and operator training. Each sampling point was functionally tested with actual process fluid. Operators received hands-on training on purge procedures, cylinder handling, and maintenance protocols. A detailed operation & maintenance manual (in Chinese and English) was delivered.

Results & Outcomes

Post-installation performance was monitored over a 6-month period, with the following documented outcomes:

MetricBefore UpgradeAfter UpgradeImprovement
Operator exposure incidents (per quarter)3-5 minor exposure events0 reported incidents100% elimination
Fugitive VOC emissions from sampling~150-200 L/week total vapor releaseNear-zero (measured below detection limit)>99% reduction
RVP analysis repeatability+/- 0.8 kPa variation+/- 0.15 kPa variation5x improvement
Lab sample rejection rate~12% (contamination/flash)<2% (procedural only)85% reduction
Time per sampling operation10-15 min (open method)4-7 min (closed loop)~50% faster

Beyond the quantifiable metrics, the refinery’s HSE department reported that the closed loop sampling upgrade was cited positively in their subsequent corporate safety audit. The environmental compliance team confirmed that sampling-related fugitive emissions were effectively eliminated from the facility’s emissions inventory report.

Key Takeaways for Refinery Operators

This project illustrates several principles that apply broadly to sampling system upgrades at any refinery or petrochemical facility:

  • One size does not fit all. A single sampling panel design cannot serve all process conditions. Volatile streams require constant-pressure piston cylinders; viscous streams need heated panels; stable liquids can use standard configurations. Proper engineering per point is essential.
  • Material traceability matters. For refinery applications, 316L stainless steel with full EN 10204 3.1 certification is the minimum standard. Sour service (H2S-containing) requires NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 compliance. Skipping material documentation to save cost is a false economy.
  • Operator training is non-negotiable. Even the best-designed closed loop system will underperform if operators fall back on old habits. Structured hands-on training during commissioning, supplemented by clear visual procedures at each sampling point, ensures sustained proper use.
  • Spare parts planning prevents downtime. Seals, gaskets, and spare cylinders should be ordered with the initial equipment. A 2-year spare parts inventory was included in this project and proved essential when one cylinder needed re-testing after a sour service exposure event.

For facilities planning similar upgrades, Wanan Technology offers site survey, engineering design, and custom manufacturing of closed loop sampling systems compliant with ASME, GB, ATEX, and PED standards. Our experience spans 40+ countries and includes work for Sinopec, PetroChina, ExxonMobil, Lukoil, and BASF facilities.

常見問題

How long does a typical closed loop sampling system upgrade take for a refinery?

For a mid-sized refinery (20-30 sampling points), the typical project timeline is 12-16 weeks from engineering kick-off to final commissioning. This includes 2-3 weeks of detailed engineering, 6-8 weeks of manufacturing, 1-2 weeks for FAT, and 2-3 weeks for site installation and commissioning. Larger facilities or those requiring heated panels for viscous service may require additional time.

Can existing sampling points be retrofitted with closed loop panels?

Yes, the vast majority of closed loop sampling upgrades are retrofits. Wanan engineers assess each existing sampling point for process connection compatibility (flange size, thread standard), structural support availability, and access clearance. Most retrofits use the existing process nozzle with a new panel-mounted assembly, minimizing hot work and process downtime.

What certifications are required for sampling systems in Chinese refineries?

For domestic refineries, the primary standards are GB/T 150 (pressure vessels), GB 5099 (seamless steel gas cylinders), and where applicable, SEPA-approved emission controls. Wanan’s sampling panels and cylinders carry ASME U-Stamp certification (internationally recognized) plus domestic GB compliance documentation. For export-oriented facilities or those with international auditing, ATEX and PED certifications may also be specified.

How are sour service (H2S) sampling points handled differently?

Sour service sampling requires NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 compliant materials throughout the wetted path. Wanan specifies hardened 316L or duplex stainless steel for valve internals, specialized sour-service seals (PTFE with acid-resistant fillers), and cylinder internal passivation. Cylinders in sour service require more frequent inspection — typically annual instead of the standard 5-year hydrostatic re-test interval.

What is the ROI timeline for a closed loop sampling upgrade?

Most refinery sampling upgrades achieve positive ROI within 12-24 months through a combination of: eliminated exposure incident costs (medical leave, insurance), reduced lab re-sample labor, avoided environmental compliance penalties, and improved product quality (fewer off-spec batches due to accurate sampling). The largest single financial impact is typically the prevention of one off-spec cargo — a single bad RVP result on a gasoline shipment can cost more than the entire sampling system investment.


Planning a sampling system upgrade? Wanan Technology’s engineering team can help you assess your facility’s needs, design custom solutions, and deliver ASME-certified equipment with full documentation. We have supplied systems to refineries and chemical plants across 40+ countries.

Request a Consultation   Download Product Catalog

石化取樣與儲槽安全技術文章

Wanan Technology 的技術資料庫涵蓋石化取樣系統、阻火器及儲槽安全閥的工程指南、選型準則與合規標準。每篇文章均由我們的壓力容器工程師及 API 認證專家撰寫,融合了 15 年以上的製造經驗,以及遍及 30 多個國家的現場安裝實務。 無論您需要依據 API 2000 標準進行壓力真空洩壓閥的選型、選用符合 ISO 16852 認證的阻火器,或是為含硫工況指定閉環取樣系統,這些指南都能提供您所需的深入技術支援。.

精選技術指南

何謂閉環取樣系統?完整指南

對閉環取樣原理、組件及應用之全面概述。內容涵蓋零排放取樣、吹掃與回流設計,以及與開環方法之比較。對於負責為煉油廠及石化廠指定取樣系統的製程工程師而言,此為必讀資料。.

《火焰阻隔器選型完全指南》

針對迸燃與爆震型火焰阻隔器的逐步選型方法。內容涵蓋 ISO 16852 分類標準、管線末端與管線內應用之區別、溫度等級,以及適用於腐蝕性工況的材質選用。並包含儲槽排氣管與蒸氣回收系統的實際範例。.

阻火器與 PVRV:您需要哪一種?

直接比較火焰阻斷器與壓力真空洩壓閥——這兩種功能各異的關鍵儲槽安全裝置。本文說明何時需要使用各自裝置、它們如何協同運作,以及可能危及儲槽安全的常見配置錯誤。.

PVRV 是如何運作的?完整技術指南

深入探討壓力真空通氣閥的運作原理。內容涵蓋彈簧式與配重式設計的比較、設定壓力計算、閥座密封性,以及 API 2000 的排氣要求。並包含維護要訣與常見故障模式。.

API 2000 儲槽通氣管尺寸選定指南(附解題範例)

根據 API 2000 標準,針對大氣儲存槽排氣管尺寸選定之實務指南。內容涵蓋因液體抽取及熱收縮所產生的吸氣、因液體注入及熱膨脹所產生的排氣,以及火災情況下的排氣。其中包含針對 10,000 桶容量儲存槽的分步計算說明。.

ISO 16852 火焰阻隔器標準解析

以淺顯易懂的語言闡述國際火焰阻斷器性能標準。內容涵蓋燃燒測試與爆震測試的區別、工作溫度分級,以及如何解讀火焰阻斷器認證標籤。對合規工程師和採購團隊而言至關重要。.

ATEX 火焰阻隔器要求 | 歐盟合規指南

關於火焰阻隔器及取樣設備符合 ATEX 指令 2014/34/EU 的完整指南。內容涵蓋設備組別、類別、區域以及 CE 標誌要求。內含進口至歐盟的合規檢查清單。.

製程分析儀的取樣系統設計指南

本工程指南旨在協助設計能向製程分析儀提供具代表性樣本的取樣系統,內容涵蓋取樣點位置、輸送管線尺寸選定、滯後時間計算以及快速迴路設計。本指南專為儀表工程師及分析儀專家撰寫。.

閉環採樣器安裝指南

經現場驗證的閉環取樣系統安裝程序。內容涵蓋工藝連接、吹掃管路佈線、取樣筒安裝及調試檢查。並包含常見取樣問題的故障排除指南。.

緊急洩壓閥選型:逐步指南(API 2000)

儲存槽緊急洩壓閥的詳細選型方法。涵蓋火災情況下的選型、異常工藝條件,以及先導式與彈簧式閥門的選型比較。包含一個 50,000 桶原油儲存槽緊急排氣的實際範例。.

涵蓋主題

  • 採樣系統 — 閉環採樣、採樣筒、採樣接頭、與製程分析儀的整合
  • 阻火器 — 燃爆與爆震阻斷器,符合 ISO 16852 標準及 ATEX 規範,提供管線末端與管線內置配置
  • 壓力真空洩壓閥 — 根據 API 2000 標準的 PVRV 選型、彈簧式與配重式之比較、通氣閥維護
  • 緊急洩壓閥 — 火災情況下的排氣、先導式閥門、緊急排氣管徑設計
  • 標準與合規性 — API 2000、ISO 16852、ATEX 2014/34/EU、ASME U 標章、OSHA、EPA
  • 材料選用 — 316L 不鏽鋼、哈氏合金 C276、雙相不鏽鋼、適用於 H₂S 及腐蝕性環境的碳鋼

為什麼要閱讀我們的技術文章?

我們技術資料庫中的每篇文章,均由具備實際製造與現場經驗的 Wanan Technology 工程師撰寫。 我們絕不沿用通用內容——每份指南皆以真實客戶專案、實際尺寸計算,以及從中國石化、埃克森美孚、巴斯夫和盧克石油等設施的安裝案例中汲取的經驗教訓為基礎。無論您是製程工程師、採購專員還是合規專員,我們的目標都是協助您做出明智的規格決策。.

需要協助為您的應用選擇合適的設備嗎? 請聯絡我們的工程團隊 以獲得個人化推薦。.

W

瓦南工程團隊

技術工程部 · 20 年以上經驗

ASME U 標章認證製造商

Wanan Technology 的工程團隊在石化取樣系統、儲槽安全設備及壓力釋放裝置的設計與製造方面,擁有超過二十年的經驗。 我們的工程師均持有 ASME、API 及 ISO 認證,並已向 40 多個國家的煉油廠、化工廠及儲存終端供應設備,合作項目包括中國石化、中國石油、埃克森美孚、盧克石油及巴斯夫等。.

認證:ASME U 標章ISO 9001ATEXEACAPI 2000PED 2014/68/EU