Case Study: Closed Loop Sampling System Upgrade at a Sinopec Refinery

Editorial Standard: This article is reviewed by Wanan Technology engineering staff with 20+ years of petrochemical equipment manufacturing experience. Content references API, ISO, ASME, and ATEX standards. About our team.

Project Overview

As one of the largest integrated energy and chemical companies in the world, Sinopec operates dozens of refineries and petrochemical complexes across China. At a major refinery in eastern China, the facility management identified a systematic gap in their process sampling infrastructure: multiple distillation units and intermediate tank farms were still relying on traditional open-loop (grab) sampling methods that posed significant safety, environmental, and data-quality risks.

Wanan Technology was contracted to design, manufacture, and supply a comprehensive نظام أخذ العينات ذو الحلقة المغلقة package covering 18 sampling points across three process units — crude distillation, catalytic cracking, and product finishing. The project scope included engineering design, material selection, fabrication, factory acceptance testing (FAT), and on-site commissioning support.

The Challenge: Aging Sampling Infrastructure

The refinery’s existing sampling setup consisted of simple needle valves and open bottles — a method that had been in use since the facility’s original construction. Over years of operation and multiple HSE audits, several critical issues had been documented:

  • Operator Exposure: Sampling personnel were routinely exposed to benzene-containing streams, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), and volatile hydrocarbon vapors. Despite PPE requirements, the risk of acute exposure during high-pressure sampling events remained a persistent concern for the HSE department.
  • Fugitive VOC Emissions: Each open-loop sampling event released an estimated 0.5 to 2 liters of hydrocarbon vapor into the atmosphere. With hundreds of sampling operations per week across the refinery, the cumulative emissions were flagged in the facility’s environmental compliance audit as a priority remediation item.
  • Sample Inaccuracy: Lab personnel reported inconsistent Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) results and variable distillation endpoints on identical feedstock samples. Root cause analysis traced the discrepancy to light-end losses during open-air sample transfer — particularly problematic for naphtha and gasoline blend stock analysis.
  • Regulatory Pressure: China’s evolving GB 31570-2015 standard for petroleum refining pollutant emission limits, combined with Sinopec’s internal corporate HSE upgrade program, created a firm deadline for sampling system modernization.

Solution Design & Engineering

Wanan’s engineering team conducted a site survey to map all 18 sampling points, documenting process conditions for each location:

Process UnitSampling PointsTypical FluidPressure RangeTemperature Range
Crude Distillation7 pointsCrude feed, naphtha, kerosene, diesel, atmospheric residue0.5 – 3.5 MPa40 – 350 C
Catalytic Cracking6 pointsLCO, gasoline, LPG, rich amine, sour water0.8 – 4.0 MPa40 – 200 C
Product Finishing5 pointsFinished gasoline, diesel, jet fuel, reformate0.3 – 2.0 MPa30 – 80 C

Based on this survey, three sampling panel configurations were designed:

1. Constant-Pressure Piston Cylinder Panels (8 points)

For volatile streams (naphtha, LPG, gasoline, reformate), constant-pressure sampling cylinders with spring-loaded pistons were specified. These maintain the sample at process pressure throughout extraction and transport, preventing light-end flash vaporization that would corrupt RVP and distillation analysis. The panels were equipped with dual-valve isolation, pressure gauges, and integrated purge loops.

2. Standard Cylinder Sampling Panels (7 points)

For stable liquid streams (diesel, kerosene, atmospheric residue, LCO), standard 316L stainless steel sampling cylinders with needle valves were selected. These panels included a process isolation valve, purge/vent valve, and cylinder connection with quick-connect fittings for efficient operator workflow.

3. Heated Sampling Panel (3 points)

For high-viscosity streams (atmospheric residue at 350 C), steam-traced heated panels with oversized bore tubing (3/8 inch minimum) were engineered to maintain fluidity during the sampling cycle. The panel design included a cooling section to bring the sample to a manageable temperature before entering the cylinder.

Equipment Supplied

ItemSpecificationQuantityCertification
Constant-pressure sampling panels316L SS, rated 6.4 MPa, with piston cylinder (500 mL)8 setsASME U-Stamp, GB/T 150
Standard sampling panels316L SS, rated 4.0 MPa, with cylinder (1 L)7 setsASME U-Stamp, GB/T 150
Heated sampling panels316L SS, steam-traced, rated 4.0 MPa, with cylinder (1 L)3 setsASME U-Stamp, GB/T 150
Spare sampling cylinders316L SS, 500 mL & 1 L, with double-end valves40 setsEN 10204 3.1, GB 5099
Spare seal kits & gasketsPTFE/Graphite, full set for 2-year operation1 lotFactory tested

Implementation & Commissioning

The project was executed over a 14-week timeline:

  1. Weeks 1-3: Detailed engineering, P&ID review, and material take-off. Wanan engineers worked with the refinery’s process engineering department to confirm all tie-in points, isolation valve locations, and sample routing paths.
  2. Weeks 4-10: Manufacturing and fabrication at Wanan’s ASME U-stamp certified facility in Honghu, Hubei. All pressure-bearing components were hydrostatically tested at 1.5x design pressure. Material traceability per EN 10204 3.1 was maintained throughout.
  3. Weeks 8-9: Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) conducted at Wanan’s facility with Sinopec inspection engineers present. Testing included pressure hold tests, valve functional tests, cylinder leak tests (helium sniffer at 1×10-6 std cc/sec sensitivity), and dimensional verification.
  4. Weeks 11-13: Shipment, site installation, and mechanical completion. Wanan field service engineers supervised the installation of all 18 sampling panels, including process tie-ins, tubing runs, and structural supports.
  5. Week 14: Commissioning and operator training. Each sampling point was functionally tested with actual process fluid. Operators received hands-on training on purge procedures, cylinder handling, and maintenance protocols. A detailed operation & maintenance manual (in Chinese and English) was delivered.

Results & Outcomes

Post-installation performance was monitored over a 6-month period, with the following documented outcomes:

MetricBefore UpgradeAfter UpgradeImprovement
Operator exposure incidents (per quarter)3-5 minor exposure events0 reported incidents100% elimination
Fugitive VOC emissions from sampling~150-200 L/week total vapor releaseNear-zero (measured below detection limit)>99% reduction
RVP analysis repeatability+/- 0.8 kPa variation+/- 0.15 kPa variation5x improvement
Lab sample rejection rate~12% (contamination/flash)<2% (procedural only)85% reduction
Time per sampling operation10-15 min (open method)4-7 min (closed loop)~50% faster

Beyond the quantifiable metrics, the refinery’s HSE department reported that the closed loop sampling upgrade was cited positively in their subsequent corporate safety audit. The environmental compliance team confirmed that sampling-related fugitive emissions were effectively eliminated from the facility’s emissions inventory report.

Key Takeaways for Refinery Operators

This project illustrates several principles that apply broadly to sampling system upgrades at any refinery or petrochemical facility:

  • One size does not fit all. A single sampling panel design cannot serve all process conditions. Volatile streams require constant-pressure piston cylinders; viscous streams need heated panels; stable liquids can use standard configurations. Proper engineering per point is essential.
  • Material traceability matters. For refinery applications, 316L stainless steel with full EN 10204 3.1 certification is the minimum standard. Sour service (H2S-containing) requires NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 compliance. Skipping material documentation to save cost is a false economy.
  • Operator training is non-negotiable. Even the best-designed closed loop system will underperform if operators fall back on old habits. Structured hands-on training during commissioning, supplemented by clear visual procedures at each sampling point, ensures sustained proper use.
  • Spare parts planning prevents downtime. Seals, gaskets, and spare cylinders should be ordered with the initial equipment. A 2-year spare parts inventory was included in this project and proved essential when one cylinder needed re-testing after a sour service exposure event.

For facilities planning similar upgrades, Wanan Technology offers site survey, engineering design, and custom manufacturing of closed loop sampling systems compliant with ASME, GB, ATEX, and PED standards. Our experience spans 40+ countries and includes work for Sinopec, PetroChina, ExxonMobil, Lukoil, and BASF facilities.

الأسئلة الشائعة

How long does a typical closed loop sampling system upgrade take for a refinery?

For a mid-sized refinery (20-30 sampling points), the typical project timeline is 12-16 weeks from engineering kick-off to final commissioning. This includes 2-3 weeks of detailed engineering, 6-8 weeks of manufacturing, 1-2 weeks for FAT, and 2-3 weeks for site installation and commissioning. Larger facilities or those requiring heated panels for viscous service may require additional time.

Can existing sampling points be retrofitted with closed loop panels?

Yes, the vast majority of closed loop sampling upgrades are retrofits. Wanan engineers assess each existing sampling point for process connection compatibility (flange size, thread standard), structural support availability, and access clearance. Most retrofits use the existing process nozzle with a new panel-mounted assembly, minimizing hot work and process downtime.

What certifications are required for sampling systems in Chinese refineries?

For domestic refineries, the primary standards are GB/T 150 (pressure vessels), GB 5099 (seamless steel gas cylinders), and where applicable, SEPA-approved emission controls. Wanan’s sampling panels and cylinders carry ASME U-Stamp certification (internationally recognized) plus domestic GB compliance documentation. For export-oriented facilities or those with international auditing, ATEX and PED certifications may also be specified.

How are sour service (H2S) sampling points handled differently?

Sour service sampling requires NACE MR0175/ISO 15156 compliant materials throughout the wetted path. Wanan specifies hardened 316L or duplex stainless steel for valve internals, specialized sour-service seals (PTFE with acid-resistant fillers), and cylinder internal passivation. Cylinders in sour service require more frequent inspection — typically annual instead of the standard 5-year hydrostatic re-test interval.

What is the ROI timeline for a closed loop sampling upgrade?

Most refinery sampling upgrades achieve positive ROI within 12-24 months through a combination of: eliminated exposure incident costs (medical leave, insurance), reduced lab re-sample labor, avoided environmental compliance penalties, and improved product quality (fewer off-spec batches due to accurate sampling). The largest single financial impact is typically the prevention of one off-spec cargo — a single bad RVP result on a gasoline shipment can cost more than the entire sampling system investment.


Planning a sampling system upgrade? Wanan Technology’s engineering team can help you assess your facility’s needs, design custom solutions, and deliver ASME-certified equipment with full documentation. We have supplied systems to refineries and chemical plants across 40+ countries.

Request a Consultation   Download Product Catalog

Petrochemical Sampling & Tank Safety Technical Articles

Wanan Technology's technical library covers engineering guides, selection criteria, and compliance standards for petrochemical sampling systems, flame arrestors, and tank safety valves. Each article is written by our pressure vessel engineers and API-certified specialists, drawing from 15+ years of manufacturing experience and field installations across 30+ countries. Whether you need to size a pressure vacuum relief valve per API 2000, select a flame arrestor certified to ISO 16852, or specify a closed loop sampling system for sour service, these guides provide the technical depth you need.

Featured Technical Guides

ما هو نظام أخذ العينات ذو الحلقة المغلقة؟ الدليل الشامل

Comprehensive overview of closed loop sampling principles, components, and applications. Covers zero-emission sample extraction, purge-and-return design, and comparison with open-loop methods. Essential reading for process engineers specifying sampling systems for refineries and petrochemical plants.

الدليل الشامل لاختيار مانعات اللهب

Step-by-step selection methodology for deflagration and detonation flame arrestors. Covers ISO 16852 classification, end-of-line vs in-line applications, temperature ratings, and material selection for corrosive service. Includes worked examples for storage tank vent pipes and vapor recovery systems.

مانع اللهب مقابل PVRV: أيهما تحتاج؟

Direct comparison of flame arrestors and pressure vacuum relief valves — two critical tank safety devices with distinct functions. Explains when each is required, how they work together, and common configuration mistakes that compromise storage tank safety.

كيف يعمل جهاز PVRV؟ دليل تقني شامل

Deep dive into pressure vacuum breather valve mechanics. Covers spring-loaded vs weight-loaded designs, set pressure calculation, seat tightness, and API 2000 venting requirements. Includes maintenance tips and common failure modes.

دليل تحديد أبعاد فتحات تهوية الخزانات وفقًا لمعيار API 2000 مع أمثلة توضيحية

Practical guide to sizing atmospheric storage tank vents per API Standard 2000. Covers inbreathing from liquid pump-out and thermal contraction, outbreathing from liquid fill and thermal expansion, and fire case venting. Includes step-by-step calculations for a 10,000-barrel tank.

شرح معيار ISO 16852 الخاص بمانع اللهب

Plain-language explanation of the international flame arrestor performance standard. Covers deflagration vs detonation testing, operating temperature classes, and how to read a flame arrestor certification label. Essential for compliance engineers and procurement teams.

ATEX Flame Arrestor Requirements | EU Compliance Guide

Complete guide to ATEX Directive 2014/34/EU compliance for flame arrestors and sampling equipment. Covers equipment groups, categories, zones, and CE marking requirements. Includes a compliance checklist for importing into the European Union.

دليل تصميم أنظمة أخذ العينات لأجهزة تحليل العمليات

Engineering guide for designing sampling systems that deliver representative samples to process analyzers. Covers sample tap location, transport line sizing, lag time calculation, and fast-loop design. Written for instrument engineers and analyzer specialists.

دليل تركيب جهاز أخذ العينات ذي الدائرة المغلقة

Field-proven installation procedures for closed loop sampling systems. Covers process connections, purge line routing, sample cylinder installation, and commissioning checks. Includes troubleshooting guide for common sampling problems.

Emergency Relief Valve Sizing: Step-by-Step Guide (API 2000)

Detailed sizing methodology for emergency pressure relief valves on storage tanks. Covers fire case sizing, abnormal process conditions, and pilot-operated vs spring-loaded selection. Includes worked examples for emergency venting of a 50,000-barrel crude oil tank.

Topics Covered

  • Sampling systems — Closed loop sampling, sample cylinders, sampling fittings, process analyzer integration
  • Flame arrestors — Deflagration and detonation arrestors, ISO 16852, ATEX compliance, end-of-line and in-line configurations
  • Pressure vacuum relief valves — PVRV sizing per API 2000, spring-loaded vs weight-loaded, breather valve maintenance
  • Emergency relief valves — Fire case venting, pilot-operated valves, emergency vent sizing
  • Standards and compliance — API 2000, ISO 16852, ATEX 2014/34/EU, ASME U-stamp, OSHA, EPA
  • Material selection — 316L SS, Hastelloy C276, Duplex SS, carbon steel for H2S and corrosive service

Why Read Our Technical Articles?

Every article in our technical library is written by Wanan Technology engineers with hands-on manufacturing and field experience. We do not repurpose generic content — each guide is based on real customer projects, actual sizing calculations, and lessons learned from installations at Sinopec, ExxonMobil, BASF, and Lukoil facilities. Our goal is to help you make informed specification decisions, whether you are a process engineer, procurement specialist, or compliance officer.

Need help selecting the right equipment for your application? Contact our engineering team for personalized recommendations.

W

فريق «وانان» الهندسي

Technical Engineering Department · 20+ years experience

ASME U-Stamp Certified Manufacturer

The Wanan Technology engineering team brings over two decades of experience in designing and manufacturing petrochemical sampling systems, storage tank safety equipment, and pressure relief devices. Our engineers hold ASME, API, and ISO certifications and have delivered equipment to refineries, chemical plants, and storage terminals across 40+ countries including projects for Sinopec, PetroChina, ExxonMobil, Lukoil, and BASF.

Certifications:ASME U-StampISO 9001ATEXEACAPI 2000PED 2014/68/EU